The ACT has previously rejected the need for fossil fuels to back up renewables.
Bowen this week described the capacity mechanism as a “matter of urgency” and said the energy ministers would consider a range of options that had been developed by the Energy Security Board (ESB).
The ESB has said states could have different operating principles in their jurisdictions, such as excluding fossil fuels.
Alinta, one of the nation’s largest electricity suppliers and owner of the Latrobe Valley Loy Yang B brown coal-fired power plant, said the tight energy market conditions meant “every technology and fuel is playing an important role in keeping the lights on”.
“So, yes, we do need coal and gas to be included in a capacity market,” Alinta chief executive Jeff Dimery said. “If you were to exclude the roughly 60 per cent of supply provided by the Latrobe Valley in Victoria, there wouldn’t be much capacity left to call on.”
Dimery said Alinta was not advocating for coal to remain in the mix for a “minute longer than necessary … and we’re getting on with developing the next generation of energy like offshore wind and hydro”.
“But they have a critical role to perform in the short to medium term,” he said.
Origin Energy chief executive Frank Calabria welcomed the “thoughtful and collaborative” effort between state, territory and federal government to address the challenges facing the energy market mechanism, and said the proposed capacity should include storage, pumped hydro and gas peaks.
Tony Wood, energy director at the Grattan Institute think tank, said short-burst gas peaking plants would be critical stop blackouts by backing up long-duration wind and solar farms that don’t work when the wind doesn’t blow or the sun doesn’t ‘t shine.
But no matter what rules were put in place to run the capacity market, he added, coal would not be economically viable.
“I don’t know how you back up renewables with other renewables,” Wood said, noting that batteries recharged by wind and solar still needed to be supplemented with other power generation.
“Even the UK has some of its capacity mechanism that encourages a diesel reserve [for electricity generation].”
Wood said coal generators would be too costly to run and too slow to fire up at short notice, to fill gaps in the grid when the weather changes.
“You need capacity that can come on very quickly and the problem for coal plants is they’re not very flexible.”
Kerry Schott, former chair of the ESB and architect of the capacity mechanism design proposals brought to the energy ministers, said every country developing a renewable electricity grid has a capacity market and “it’s one of my great regrets that it has taken so long” to be brought into Australia.
Schott told the Australian Energy Week conference on Thursday that while she hadn’t seen the finalized proposal to be put to ministers, she thought it could exclude funds for coal but rule in gas.
There are expected to be two models that ministers could choose between.
Under one, the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) would determine how much dispatchable power was needed to back up renewables across the electricity grid and it would contract to buy this capacity from a range of generators. Electricity retailers would be required to bid to buy this capacity in an auction, which would be used to fund the necessary power generation projects.
The other model is a market-based mechanism that cuts out AEMO as the middle man, where retailers have to purchase enough dispatchable capacity to back up the electricity generation they are buying from power generators.
Schott cautioned that the market mechanism was more complicated, while it was likely that AEMO would be too risk-averse under the capacity reserve and spend more money than buying backup power.” “Neither is ideal, but we do need something,” she said .
EnergyAustralia director Mark Collette said the orderly managing transition from coal was the “big challenge of the energy system”, and he was encouraging that ministers were prioritising the ESB’s proposals.
“Providing the right investment signals for new capacity is essential for our energy transition,” he said. “Equally essential is an orderly retirement of coal generation – timed so that the new system is ready beforehand. ”
Cut through the noise of federal politics with news, views and expert analysis from Jacqueline Maley. Subscribers can sign up to our weekly Inside Politics newsletter here.